Announcement

Message

Theme

Call for Papers

Registration UPDATED

Accommodation

Visitor Information UPDATED

Committees

Plenary Speakers

Posters UPDATED

Workshops

Programme UPDATED

 

Contact:
Assoc Prof
Dr
Lim Chap Sam
cslim@usm.my

Theme:

 

PLEANARY SPEAKERS

 

Prof. Paul Ernest (University of Exeter, U.K.) [biodata]

What Is Mathematics Education Culture? [abstract]

 

Prof. Wei Chi Yang (Radford University, U.S.A.) [biodata]

Making Mathematics Accessible To Most Through Innovative Use Of Technology [abstract]

 

Prof. Noor Azlan Ahmad Zanzali (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia) [biodata]

A Holistic Approach Of Assessment In Mathematics [abstract]

 

Prof. Berinderjeet Kaur (National Institute of Education, Singapore) [biodata]

Teaching And Learning Of Mathematics – What Really Matters To Teachers And To Students? [abstract]

 

Prof. Ryosuke Nagaoka (Japan) [biodata]

How The Respect For Mathematics Education Can Be Kept In Societies: A Key Conception To Be Shared Among Mathematics Teachers [abstract]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prof. Paul Ernest (University of Exeter, U.K.)

Paul Ernest is a Professor of the Philosophy of Mathematics Education at Exeter University, where he directs the international distance learning masters and doctoral programmes in mathematics education. Well known internationally for his research and conference contributions, he has over 200 publications ranging across the field of mathematics education. His books include The Philosophy of Mathematics Education, Falmer 1991, and Social Constructivism as a Philosophy of Mathematics, SUNY Press, 1998, and he edits the international Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, <http://www.ex.ac.uk/~PErnest/>.  Currently he is working on the semiotics of mathematics education.

 

Top

 

Plenary Title: WHAT IS MATHEMATICS EDUCATION CULTURE?

Abstract:

My aim is to deconstruct the concept of mathematics education culture. Deconstruction analyzes concepts to show their elements, but also reveals the oppositions and tensions between them. The two main elements of this culture are the culture of mathematics teaching and learning, in and out of school, and the culture of mathematics education research.

The culture of teaching and learning mathematics includes: teacher cultures; mathematics classroom practices; books and material resources including information and communication technologies; student cultures including their attitudes aims and values, the cultures of schools; societal aims, values, attitudes, including conceptions of mathematics and of the teaching and learning of mathematics; overall societal ideologies.

The culture of research includes: theories of mathematics education, both ‘home-grown’ and drawing on other disciplines; research findings on teaching and learning; the individual researchers and institutions of mathematics education research, including conferences, journals, and other publication channels; links with government and other social institutions; ideologies of mathematics education research.

These two elements have a complex relationship encompassing both supporting consonances and oppositions, such as: practice vs. theory; realistic present constraints vs. freely imagined futures; accepted societal values vs. their questioning and interrogation; measures of effective practice vs. pure knowledge outputs. Such conflicts are experienced by students in teacher education, both at the Initial training and professional development stages, as they move between universities and schools. At the same time, both elements are equally affected by the globalization of practice and theory in mathematics education as it steamrollers local cultures and practices.

 

Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prof. Wei-Chi Yang (Radford University, U.S.A.)

Professor Wei-Chi Yang currently is working at the Department of Math and Stats at Radford University, Virginia, USA. He received his B.S. from Taiwan, M.S. and Ph.D. from University of California at Davis. He was invited as a visiting professor at Universidad Diego Portales, Chile in 2005 and received a grant from National Science Council of Taiwan to give a series of lectures and workshops in the area of technology and mathematics. He is the founder of the Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (ATCM) <http://atcm.mathandtech.org/> and he has been the editor-in-chief of the refereed ATCM Proceedings for many years. He had co-authored a book 'Exploring Mathematics with Scientific Notebook'. Professor Yang had traveled around the world, given over 200 presentations on the innovative use of technology in teaching, learning and research in Mathematics for the past 15 years.

 

Top

 

Plenary Title: MAKING MATHEMATICS ACCESSIBLE TO MOST THROUGH INNOVATIVE USE OF TECHNOLOGY

Abstract:

This paper aims to share with the audience how mathematics communities around the world had implemented the use of technology and the impact of such implementation. It also proposes new areas that technological tools will impact on our teaching, learning and research in Mathematics.

Geometry and Analysis have been around for centuries. Recent technological tools will make impacts in the area of Dynamic Analytical Geometry. In this talk, I will show why exploring mathematics with technology should be a FACT-Fun, Accessible, Challenging and Theoretical.

a) Many examples from calculus to advanced calculus will be demonstrated with the help of dynamic geometry software and Computer Algebra System (CAS).

b) We will see when to incorporate various software packages so mathematical problems can be made accessible to most but challenging to some.

c) We will also see how to create contents that usable to those learners who don’t have particular software.

 

Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prof. Noor Azlan Ahmad Zanzali (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia)

 

Noor Azlan Ahmad Zanzali is a professor at the Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Being an expert in the field of Mathematics Curriculum and Instruction, he is well sought by the Malaysian Ministry of Education to be evaluator for various teacher education courses in the teaching colleges, as well as in the expert panel of curriculum developers for the Secondary School Mathematics curriculum. Currently, Prof. Azlan has been appointed as the consultant for a major research project funded by the Examination Syndicate, Ministry of Education. This research aims mainly to produce an alternative non-cognitive assessment for the whole nation.

 

Top

 

Plenary Title: A HOLISTIC APPROACH OF ASSESSMENT IN MATHEMATICS

Abstract:

Assessment should be an integral part of teaching and learning mathematics. It is often argued that assessment practices should be in harmony with the current curriculum content and goals so as to be able to inform the teaching practices. Assessment should be able to measure what we value. However, present practices of assessment do not reflect the above concerns. Thus, there is a need to develop new assessment practices that will be able to complement the widely-used traditional techniques. Based on the aims and goals of the Malaysia mathematics education as an example, this paper addresses this issue by firstly, examining the differences between the current assessment practices and what is expected from the stipulated curriculum. These analyses will then be used as bases for the need to develop a holistic assessment approach in mathematics. This paper will look at some suggested standards in mathematics assessment. A project that attempts to help teachers to use assessment for learning will be discussed. This paper concludes with some suggested practices that will help to assess students learning in a more holistic fashion.

 

Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prof. Berinderjeet Kaur (National Institute of Education, Singapore)

Berinderjeet Kaur is an Associate Professor in the Maths & Maths Edn Academic Group at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University. Her primary interest is the teaching and learning (pedagogy) of Mathematics. She has vast experience both locally and internationally in this area. She has been a consultant to mathematics programmes in several primary and secondary schools in Singapore. She has also been involved in numerous international projects on mathematics attainment and classroom pedagogy. She has given numerous presentations at conferences held in the region as well as in various parts of the world. Her publications appear in regional and international journals. She is also on the editorial boards of several local and international journals.  For her tireless devotion to the professional development of mathematics teachers in Singapore she was awarded the Fellow of Teachers Network in the years 2003 and 2004. On Singapore’s 41st National Day in 2006 she was also awarded the Public Administration Medal by the President of Singapore.

 

Top

 

Plenary Title: TEACHING AND LEARNING OF MATHEMATICS – WHAT

REALLY MATTERS TO TEACHERS AND TO STUDENTS?


Abstract:

As learning is dependent upon the situations and circumstances in which it is engendered and the feelings these situations provoke in students, any attempt to improve mathematics teaching must take into account both teacher practice, learner practice and their responses to each others practice. The Learners’ Perspective Study (LPS) (Clarke, 2001; 2002), motivated by a strong belief that the characterization of the practices of mathematics classrooms must attend to learner practice with at least the same priority as that accorded to teacher practice, is a comprehensive study that adopts a complimentary accounts methodology (Clarke, 2001) to negotiate meanings in classrooms (Clarke, 2001). In Singapore, to date, three mathematics teachers recognized for their locally-defined ‘teaching competence’ have participated in the study. The comprehensive sets of data from the three classrooms have made it possible to explore several premises related to the teaching and learning of mathematics. During the presentation, data and findings from the three classrooms that shed light on the practices that really matters to teachers and to students during mathematics lessons will be presented.

 

Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prof. Ryosuke Nagaoka (Japan)

Ryosuke Nagaoka is a professor of Mathematics and Informatics at the University of the Air, the open and distance learning university in Japan. After studying numerical analysis of partial differential equation at the University of Tokyo, he changed his interest to focus on the philosophy and history of mathematics at the Graduate School of the University of Tokyo, where he submitted his paper on the historical development and philosophical meaning of the set theory by Georg Cantor. Since then he has become more interested in mathematical education particularly in the upper secondary and tertiary level. For the last twenty years he has been a writer of a series of mathematical textbooks for high school students and now he is the Chief of the editorial board of a series.

 

Top

 

Plenary Title: How The Respect For Mathematics Education Can Be Kept In Societies: A Key Conception To Be Shared Among Mathematics Teachers

Abstract:

There are so many topics on mathematics education from the theoretical to the practical. But the most important one is undoubtedly the way to realize really rich mathematics education or to remove the obstacles to this realization. Needless to point out, the key factor in rich mathematics education to general young people is not the material nor the design of subjects, but the good teachers, because it is only through their teachers that people learn not only how to solve mathematical problems but also what mathematics is. However, there is a growing common tendency in the 'developed' or 'advanced' countries that it has been become more and more difficult to get good mathematics teachers. As a result, mathematics education has met more and more serious difficulties. But very regrettably, the past 'innovative' efforts that aim to solve the difficulties yet without the view point of keeping the good teachers, these problems have become more serious. We should implement the future mathematics education keeping the serious boundary condition that we cannot expect teachers too much and the high ideal that we can and should expect student potential as much as possible.

 

Top